Back Button
Menu Button

Another One Bites the Dust – Haven Ends Healthcare Quest

The medical industrial complex has claimed yet another innocent victim. But this is not just any victim.

Three years ago, an independent company, Haven Health, was formed by three powerhouse forces in the business world: Amazon, JPMorgan Chase and Berkshire Hathaway. Meant to transform healthcare, Haven was a very unique collaboration that put the healthcare industry on notice that a new sheriff would be in town to help clean up a messy and unruly industry dominated by legacy players.

The likes of Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan Chase) and Warren Buffett (Berkshire Hathaway) were serving as the newly-assembled sheriff that would instill both fear and respect by industry inhabitants.  When this marriage was announced in 2018, I wrote a blog about the likelihood of having three disruptive ‘outsiders’ force long overdue changes to healthcare practices. I ended this blog with one stark sentence: “Only time will tell.”

Time is Now Here

It appears the healthcare industry is more complex (and unforgiving) than even the sheriff had believed. This most recent development reminds me of what President Trump naively claimed while attempting to repeal and replace Obamacare in 2017: “Nobody knew that healthcare could be so complicated…”

On Monday of this week, Haven announced that it will end its mission of exploring healthcare solutions, such as “piloting new ways to make primary care easier to access, insurance benefits simpler to understand and easier to use, and prescription drugs more affordable.” According to the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), any collaboration between these companies will become less formal in the future.

In addition to impacting their own respective workforces, the collaboration also intended to influence and disrupt the payment and delivery models currently in place. Reading between the lines, however, when their appointed chief executive, Dr. Atul Gawande, stepped down from his role in May of 2020, perhaps the proverbial ‘flywheel’ lost any inertia it may have gained.

Lesson Learned

Going forward, it will take more than three highly-respected leaders and their innovative organizations to mildly disrupt a system that desperately needs disruption, but has largely resisted meaningful changes. Many have tried to reform this massive industry, but up to this point, there has been very limited success.

In healthcare, bold changes may only come after America experiences an unimaginable crisis beyond anything we’ve ever encountered before.  But then again, only time will tell.

–Update on Hospital Price Transparency Requirement

My Tuesday blog on the new hospital price transparency mandate revealed that two major Des Moines hospitals have not posted the required pricing information despite a national mandate to do so – beginning January 1. The penalty for noncompliance is, quite frankly, small potatoes for at least larger hospitals – just $300 a day. To learn more, the CMS issued a FAQ on December 23.

According to POLITICO Pulse just one-third of the top 20 hospitals have posted visible price lists as of New Year’s Day. Politico reports, of those hospitals that have posted, the information is often vague or hard-to-decifer. More to come in future blogs on this subject.

To stay abreast of employee benefits, we invite you to subscribe to our blog.

New Trend or Passing Fad?
Remote Work Environments

This blog is the first in a new series regarding the ‘unintentional consequences’ of the COVID-19 pandemic. As our lives have been abruptly altered due to social distancing requirements – both at home and in the workplace – unplanned ‘disruption’ of previous normal activities could permanently replace sacred elements once believed to be unyielding to any change. But COVID-19 just may have dictated new approaches to how we live and work.

Prior to March and the COVID-19 pandemic, shuttered workplace offices and businesses in Iowa and around the country was unthinkable, it just could not happen – or so we believed. The only way it could happen, we reasoned, was through a sci-fi movie that made this horrifically possible.

But it DID happen, and this B-level movie with an apocalyptic plot has now become reality. Jeffrey Cole, a research professor at the University of Southern California, calls this period in our lives the “greatest social science experiment of all time.” Lockdowns, layoffs and massive public measures to contain COVID-19 “will last long after any threat from the virus is gone,” Cole shared. “In the future, we’ll talk about ‘BC,’ before corona, and after.”

As organizations prepare to reopen businesses and offices throughout our country, thermal scanners and hand sanitizers will be the bare minimum required to keep employees and customers safe. The foreseeable future remains extremely murky as to when (or whether) life will return to pre-virus living. Although working remotely has been around for many years, telecommuting has become an uninvited experimentation for many Iowa and U.S. employers and their employees.

Many health experts believe it will be months, if not years, before a ‘new normal’ develops in our country. Scientists struggle to understand the intricacies of COVID-19. The Wild West mentality of searching for a vaccine to protect people has become a major national priority. America, after all, must cobble together innovative approaches to get people back to work while keeping the public safe.

Working Remotely – an ‘Audition’ for the Future

To ensure safe, social distancing to minimize risk of a second (or third) wave of infections, some organizations are planning to eliminate long rows of desks without partitions, replacing them with work-stations sheathed with glass sneeze guards. Having more space between desks and wearing masks will supplement periodic temperature tests. Designating staircases for entry and exit, strategically staggering lunches and work times will also be very much part of new work environments.

The pandemic has offered proof – supportive or not – that in given industries and organizations, some people can work efficiently from a remote location without having to be physically stationed in an office with other co-workers. It must be noted, however, the mental wellbeing of more isolated workers must seriously be considered and addressed before making a leap into expanding remote workplaces. Will future work mean abandoning in-person connections and replacing with internet connections?

A friend recently mentioned that working remotely for a large insurance company revealed enhanced positive customer service metrics that surpassed pre-COVID-19 results.  This revelation provides a new frame of reference to this organization that working remotely can offer surprising benefits to the company…and to its customers. Having these new performance metrics to complement decision making will be critical in the future.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company recently announced a permanent transition to a hybrid operating model that consists primarily of four main corporate campuses (Central Ohio, Des Moines, Scottsdale and San Antonio) for in-office personnel and working-from-home in most other locations. Although Nationwide had been investing in technological capabilities to do this for years, the pandemic has urgently nudged Nationwide to make these changes now.

Recent Studies about Telecommuting Experiences

According to data from the Coronavirus Disruption Project, 42 percent of American workers said their telecommuting experience has made them want to work from home more. Not too surprisingly, 61 percent of those teleworking said they are enjoying the relaxed attire and grooming standards, greater flexibility and lack of a commute. Over three-quarters (78 percent) said they are as effective or more so working from home.

From the employer viewpoint, nearly three-quarters of corporate finance officials surveyed in late March by Gartner, a business research and consulting firm, revealed that at least five percent of surveyed organizations will convert on-site workers to permanent remote status as part of their post-COVID cost-cutting efforts.

A survey by USA Today and LinkedIn reveals that, according to 54 percent of respondents ages 18-74, working at home positively impacts work productivity. Reasons cited for higher productivity include time saved from commuting (71 percent), fewer distractions from co-workers (61 percent) and fewer meetings (39 percent).

It is fair to say the virus has served as an audition for organizations to determine whether working remotely can become the norm based on the type of work being performed. The implications of evolving from office locations to remote or home locations can have immense consequences to the economy.

The supply and demand of office space could change significantly if organizations eschew owning larger buildings or rent smaller office space than in the past. Even ‘The Oracle of Omaha’ himself, Warren Buffett, has commented that working from home may very well become the norm because productivity has not suffered in certain scenarios. Buffett commented, “…When change happens in the world, you adjust to it.”

Conclusion

Suffice it to say that most organizations are not yet making radical permanent changes when responding to a seemingly ‘transient’ pandemic. However, developing worksites that can appropriately adapt to COVID-19 – and any future health threats – warrants implementing strategies that go beyond short-term fixes.

While embracing telecommuting, organizations may find low-hanging fruit by purchasing or renting smaller buildings and office spaces and convert these overhead ‘savings’ into other operational investments, which could positively impact employee pay and benefits. Would an upward trend of telecommuting adversely impact sectors that currently cater to office-based employees? Absolutely. Lower fuel consumption for commuting, altered business attire and relaxed cosmetic usage are just a few examples of potential long-term disruption that may occur.

We are only two months into this pandemic, yet much is to be learned by employers about long-term trends versus short-term fads in the workplace setting. My best guess is that the COVID-19 will make telecommuting a more permanent fixture in the business world where it makes most sense to the organization and its customers. As the telecommuting ‘experimentation’ phase continues, each organization must weigh the pros and cons when strategizing for the future.

Next Week’s Discussion:  COVID-19 and Telemedicine

To stay abreast of employee benefits, we invite you to subscribe to our blog.

Healthcare – Time to Recognize and Confront the ‘Elephant in the Room’

Have you ever been involved with an obvious situation, either personally or professionally, that was largely ignored and going unaddressed? Perhaps a work scenario in which a manager who wields considerable organizational power was impacting the workplace culture in an extremely uncomfortable and unhealthy direction. Speaking up may cause one to lose his/her job or suffer long-term upward job mobility opportunities. Self-preservation is a natural powerful reaction when confronting a seemingly formidable opponent – we simply choose not to act at all.

The fear of speaking up is a metaphor for an ‘Elephant in the room.’

This is happening today in our healthcare delivery and payment environment. We frequently see or experience unacceptable situations that clearly require action to prevent it from happening in the future. As a reader of my blogs, you are keenly aware of the egregious nature of the medical establishment hiding their preventable medical error ‘indiscretions’ in the proverbial litterbox – covering up preventable mistakes that are not meant for public viewing. Yet, without being held accountable for their actions, the medical community will continue to repeat what should be un-repeatable.

The elephant exists in healthcare in a number of ways. Below are just a few prime examples.

Employers are Reluctant

Employers serve as the real payers of healthcare, yet oddly sit on the sidelines exhaustively complaining about the high cost of health insurance and how it adversely impacts their competitiveness in the markets they serve. Unfortunately, most employers are reluctant to bring up the inherent dysfunctional problems because hospitals and medical practices are considered to be ‘other’ large, recognizable community members that are off-limits to public correction. In fact, many business owners are board members at the local hospital, making it difficult to publicly speak up while serving in a ‘distinguished’ role. As real payers, employers can clearly climb into the driver’s seat to collectively initiate sorely-needed changes in how the healthcare establishment behaves. But to do so, they must firmly take hold of the steering wheel to begin the journey. Instead, the employers have historically farmed out this responsibility to the insurance companies.

Insurance Companies Lack Initiative

One can be equally mystified by insurance companies’ lack of initiative when it comes to medical errors. By default, these ‘third-party payers’ assume the purchasing role as an intermediary between the real payers and health providers. More often than not, employers assume that insurance companies are adequately vetting the quality-of-care their network providers are giving to their employees and family members. This is largely not happening. As a paid intermediary, insurers can play a vital role in determining whether their subscribers are receiving the best possible outcomes from the care being purchased through the insurers’ networks.

Because the medical community will not admit their playful litterbox games, an appropriate opportunity for safety-conscious insurers would be to randomly survey their members after they have been discharged from a hospital to learn about their experiences – specifically as it relates to preventable medical errors. Doing so could be a great branding opportunity for innovative, forward-thinking insurance carriers. Over time, when enough patient feedback has been collected and analyzed, insurers can then become a more engaged advocate for employers and their employees when vetting network providers. Why are insurers not performing this difficult but necessary work on behalf of their members? Great question. They should.

Medical Community Touts Economic Strength

The medical community, specifically hospitals, spend a good deal of our[1] money to help perpetuate their economic value in the communities they serve. Recently, the Iowa Hospital Association purchased airtime on at least one local television station to help educate Iowans about the “economic impact” hospitals have in Iowa, including:

  • Number of hospital workers employed in Iowa
  • Benefits hospitals provide to the communities
  • Number of additional jobs created by hospitals

Similar to a certain species of cicadas, which are insects that remain underground from 2-to-17 years before emerging to be seen and heard, the hospital community will annually reveal themselves to promote their substantial workforce and economic growth – but remain curiously silent on the indiscretions buried deep inside the litterbox. Apparently, this marketing scheme successfully elevates their status as the elephant in any room, whether it be in Iowa or some other state. This diversional tactic makes it difficult for others to honestly speak out about the associated problems the elephant causes within our communities. After all, who doesn’t want jobs? No one wants to be ridiculed as a ‘naysayer.’ Unfortunately, honesty may come at a great expense.

Joe Gardyasz of the Des Moines Business Record recently wrote an insightful piece (subscription required) about healthcare jobs in Iowa. Even though jobs in the healthcare sector have surpassed U.S. manufacturing and retail sectors for the first time in 2017, Iowa’s manufacturing sector – at least for now – still outpaces healthcare jobs in our state.

Why healthcare has become the most dominant sector in our country

Other than rising demographic trends of an older population requiring more healthcare services, the most plausible reason for more healthcare jobs is likely due to gross inefficiencies in an inordinately complex environment. As mentioned in my previous blog, “Healthcare Billing Process – The Cost of Doing Business,” non-healthcare industries might typically employ 100 full-time equivalents to collect payment for $1 billion in services, but healthcare employs 770 full-time equivalents per $1 billion of physician services. Keep in mind, healthcare is now a $3+ trillion-dollar industry – which primarily explains why healthcare jobs are soaring past other more-efficient sectors.

Put another way, if non-healthcare sectors wish to tout their economic dominance in their respective communities or state, they would need to become bloated with inefficiencies that would inflate costs, revenue and increase employment opportunities. Thankfully, largely due to powerful market forces that are embedded with price and quality transparencies, those sectors are forced to act efficiently by offering reasonably-priced products and services that are of the highest value. The healthcare industry, it seems, is oddly immune from having to play by these transparency rules. According to Warren Buffett, “Healthcare is the tapeworm of the American economy.”

Through our entrenched relationships (e.g. family, work, business and community), we are too often reticent about changing the status quo when it might possibly ‘threaten’ the comforts of doing nothing. Employers, insurance companies and the medical establishment are each capable of making the necessary changes, but at times, must be ‘nudged’ to do so. The late Stephen Hawking made a great point by writing, “I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road.”

What IS the Elephant?

Regarding healthcare, if each of us fails to recognize, acknowledge and confront the elephant in the room, we too become complicit in this persistent, serious and increasingly costly and harmful problem. If we continue to sit on our hands and do nothing, we eventually enable the elephant to become even larger and more undisciplined.

So what is this elephant in our collective “healthcare room?” John Atkinson of Wrong Hands developed a ‘chartoon‘ about this metaphor, whether the elephant appears in healthcare or elsewhere.

Isn’t it time to begin “eating” this elephant one bite at a time? It starts by recognizing and acknowledging the elephant in the room, and then crossing that road to initiate necessary improvement.

To learn more, we invite you to subscribe to our blog.

[1] For the services they provide, hospitals are predominantly recipients of our tax dollars, government-related grants, philanthropic donations, insurance premiums and personal out-of-pocket payments.